§

Bedgear, LLC

IPR2017-00524 (P.T.A.B. Aug. 11, 2021)
Bedgear, LLC

5 Cited authorities

  1. Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

    941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019)   Cited 58 times   62 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the USPTO is not required to reopen the record or permit new briefing

  2. Bedgear, LLC v. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co.

    2018-2170 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 29, 2020)

    2018-2170 04-29-2020 BEDGEAR, LLC, Appellant v. FREDMAN BROS. FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., Appellee PER CURIAM. NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-00524. ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING Before LOURIE, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER Bedgear, LLC petitions the court for panel rehearing on the basis that it raised an Appointments Clause challenge in its opening brief. In view

  3. Section 318 - Decision of the Board

    35 U.S.C. § 318   Cited 161 times   140 Legal Analyses
    Governing the incorporation of claims added via the operation of § 316(d)

  4. Section 317 - Settlement

    35 U.S.C. § 317   Cited 37 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Addressing continuation of IPR as to some petitioners after dismissal of others

  5. Section 42.74 - Settlement

    37 C.F.R. § 42.74   Cited 3 times   13 Legal Analyses

    (a)Board role. The parties may agree to settle any issue in a proceeding, but the Board is not a party to the settlement and may independently determine any question of jurisdiction, patentability, or Office practice. (b)Agreements in writing. Any agreement or understanding between the parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of a proceeding shall be in writing and a true copy shall be filed with the Board before the termination of the trial. (c)Request to keep separate