§

Bancroft Manufacturing Co., Inc.

189 N.L.R.B. 619 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
Bancroft Manufacturing Co., Inc.

21 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  3. Surprenant Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 60 times
    In Surprenant Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965) this Court approved as non-threatening, language of the employer which was much stronger than that used in the present case.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Varo, Inc.

    425 F.2d 293 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 47 times
    High-ranking officer, in his office and with secretary present and taking notes, questioned employees

  5. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B

    354 F.2d 432 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 54 times
    In James H. Matthews Co., supra, the employee in question signed an authorization card. Later the union received a letter, postmarked 11 days after the effective date for determining majority status of the union, requesting return of the employee's authorization card. Allegedly, the letter was neither written, dated, nor addressed by the employee and was originally left with an undisclosed person.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. River Togs, Inc.

    382 F.2d 198 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 48 times
    In NLRB v. River Togs, Inc. (2d Cir. July 27, 1967) 382 F.2d 198, however, we recognized some of the limitations of the authorization card procedure, calling for scrutiny of the manner of execution of the cards.

  7. Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    424 F.2d 818 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 36 times
    Affirming Board determination that employer's evidence was not new because "no explanation was offered as to why this evidence was not discovered or could not have been discovered by the exercise of due diligence"

  8. Mon River Towing, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    421 F.2d 1 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 27 times
    Recognizing that the involvement of supervisory union members in union affairs conflicts with "the need to assure the complete devotion of union negotiating teams to employee interests"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Sinclair Company

    397 F.2d 157 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 28 times
    In NLRB v. Sinclair Co., 397 F.2d 157, 161 (1st Cir. 1968), one of the three consolidated cases disposed of in the Gissel opinion, the Court of Appeals said, "Whether an employer has used language that is coercive in its effect is a question essentially for the specialized experience of the Board."

  10. Serv-Air, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    395 F.2d 557 (10th Cir. 1968)   Cited 28 times
    Applying special circumstances approach to rule banning the wearing of multiple badges

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,321 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355