13 Cited authorities
Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
522 U.S. 359 (1998) Cited 426 times 13 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"
Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.
484 U.S. 539 (1988) Cited 329 timesHolding that the remedy provided in §§ 515 and 502(g) "is limited to the collection of `promised contributions' and does not confer jurisdiction on district courts to determine whether an employer's unilateral decision to refuse to make post-contract contributions constitutes a violation of the NLRA."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal AnalysesApproving "discovery-type standard"
Brooks v. Labor Board
348 U.S. 96 (1954) Cited 300 timesHolding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 702 (1944) Cited 252 times 1 Legal AnalysesRecognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968) Cited 102 times 1 Legal AnalysesApplying Taft
Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
285 F.3d 1073 (D.C. Cir. 2002) Cited 8 times 1 Legal AnalysesNo. 00-1443. Argued November 1, 2001. Decided April 12, 2002. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Donald H. Scharg argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs were Steven J. Fishman and Thomas A. Pinch. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel
Lee Lumber and Bldg. Material v. N.L.R.B
310 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 2002) Cited 5 times 2 Legal AnalysesStating that this court "`review the Board's factual conclusions' only for `substantial evidence,' and must `uphold the Board's application of law to facts unless arbitrary or otherwise erroneous'" (quoting Harter Tomato Products Co. v. NLRB, 133 F.3d 934, 937 (D.C. Cir. 1998))
Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. N.L.R.B
939 F.2d 402 (6th Cir. 1991) Cited 4 timesNos. 90-6340, 90-6539. Argued July 18, 1991. Decided August 5, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 18, 1991. Keith A. Ashmus (argued), Carl H. Gluek, Thompson, Hine Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner, cross-respondent. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., John C. Truesdale, Executive Secretary, Margaret E. Luke (argued), N.L.R.B., Office of the Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Frederick Calatrello, Director, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent
Gulf States Mfrs., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
598 F.2d 896 (5th Cir. 1979) Cited 13 timesNo. 77-2406. July 10, 1979. James F. Smith, Gary R. Kessler, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Carol A. DeDeo, Marion Griffin, Jesse I. Etelson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN and VANCE
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,325 times 84 Legal AnalysesGranting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355