§

AT&T Connecticut

34-CA-012451 (N.L.R.B. Jun. 18, 2010)
AT&T Connecticut

7 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 513 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Mead Corp.

    73 F.3d 74 (6th Cir. 1996)   Cited 12 times

    No. 94-6250. Argued November 27, 1995. Decided January 8, 1996. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Frederick C. Havard (briefed), Christopher Young (argued and briefed), N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Robert Joseph Brown (argued and briefed), Todd D. Penney, Thompson, Hine Flory, Dayton, OH, for Respondent. On Application For Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before: MARTIN and JONES, Circuit Judges; COHN, District Judge. The Honorable Avern Cohn

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Dorn's Transportation Company

    405 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 40 times
    Noting that "a good faith effort to conform to the requirements of the law" would be a legal motivation for withholding benefits

  5. Midstate Tel. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    706 F.2d 401 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 10 times
    Applying special circumstances approach to rule banning a particular type of T-shirt

  6. Borman's Inc., v. N.L.R.B

    676 F.2d 1138 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 4 times
    Upholding ban where slogan contained profanity

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Floridan Hotel of Tampa, Inc.

    318 F.2d 545 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 11 times

    No. 20081. June 7, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. L. Robert Frank, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before RIVES, LEWIS, and BELL, Circuit Judges. Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge. This case presents a novel question: May an employer with no discriminatory purpose prohibit the wearing of pins indicating union membership or status