§

American Medical Response

20-CA-234200 (N.L.R.B. Aug. 23, 2019)
American Medical Response

8 Cited authorities

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation

  2. Rashkind v. Marrero

    450 U.S. 913 (1981)   Cited 163 times
    Finding violation of Fourth Amendment rights sufficient

  3. Louis v. McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp.

    460 F. Supp. 2d 1153 (C.D. Cal. 2006)   Cited 116 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing and citing ample authority under California law for the fact that service employees are entitled to share in a tip-pooling arrangement even if that employee was not the one to wait on the tipping patron because restaurants should be allowed to implement such a widespread practice to ensure that all service employees share equitably in gratuities

  4. Teachers Coll. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    902 F.3d 296 (D.C. Cir. 2018)   Cited 4 times

    No. 17-1151 C/w 17-1184 09-04-2018 TEACHERS COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Local 2110, Technical, Office and Professional Union, United Auto Workers AFL-CIO, Intervenor Matthew J. Frankel, Boston, MA, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Kenneth J. Nichols, Washington, DC, and Tara E. Daub, Jericho, NY. David Casserly, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were

  5. Am. Baptist Homes Business v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    858 F.3d 612 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 1 times

    No. 15-1445 C/w 15-1501 06-06-2017 AMERICAN BAPTIST HOMES OF THE WEST, doing business as Piedmont Gardens, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Service Employees International Union, United Healthcare Workers–West, Intervenor David S. Durham argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Christopher M. Foster, San Francisco, CA. Kellie J. Isbell, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin

  6. Peterson v. State of Cal. Dept. of Corr

    319 F. App'x 679 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 5 times

    No. 07-16424. Argued and Submitted February 13, 2009. Filed March 19, 2009. James C. Holland, Esquire, Visalia, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Richard Lee Manford, Esquire, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Lawrence J. O'Neill, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-06-00349-LJO. Before: NOONAN, BERZON and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM This disposition

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

    622 F.2d 425 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that the Board did not abuse its discretion by refusing to defer an information dispute to arbitration

  8. Section 82 - Division of Labor Law Enforcement abolished

    Cal. Lab. Code § 82   Cited 12 times

    (a) The Division of Labor Standards Enforcement succeeds to, and is vested with, all of the powers, duties, purposes, responsibilities, and jurisdiction of the Division of Labor Law Enforcement, which is hereby abolished. (b) All powers, duties, purposes, and responsibilities of the Labor Commissioner, who is Chief of the Division of Labor Law Enforcement, are hereby transferred to the Labor Commissioner who is the Chief of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. (c) Any regulation or other