§

Amalgamated Transit Union, Local Union No. 1433, AFL-CIO (Veolia Transportation Services, Inc. Phoen

28-CB-078377 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 28, 2012)
Amalgamated Transit Union, Local Union No. 1433, AFL-CIO (Veolia Transportation Services, Inc. Phoen

6 Cited authorities

  1. Wooley v. Maynard

    430 U.S. 705 (1977)   Cited 984 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional a law requiring motorists to display the state motto on license plates given that a vehicle "is readily associated with its operator" and thus the law requires drivers to "use their private property as a 'mobile billboard' for the State's ideological message"

  2. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo

    418 U.S. 241 (1974)   Cited 480 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional a state law that required newspapers to provide "right to reply" to any candidate who was personally or professionally assailed in order to eliminate the "abuses of bias and manipulative reportage" by the press

  3. Pacific Gas Elec. Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n

    475 U.S. 1 (1986)   Cited 295 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state agency may not require a utility company to include a third-party newsletter in its billing envelope

  4. Zeran v. America Online

    129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 340 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding CDA immunity applied even though “AOL unreasonably delayed in removing defamatory messages posted by an unidentified third party, refused to post retractions of those messages, and failed to screen for similar postings thereafter”

  5. Austin v. Crystaltech Web Hosting

    211 Ariz. 569 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 11 times

    No. 1 CA-CV 04-0823. December 22, 2005. Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County, No. CV2004-000253, Cathy M. Holt, J. Britt Bluff, P.C., By Edward H. Britt, Kathryn A. Battock, Phoenix, Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant. Hopkins Kreamer L.L.P., By Stephen M. Hopkins, Gregorio M. Garcia, Phoenix, Attorneys for Defendants-Appellees. OPINION PORTLEY, Judge. ¶ 1 We are asked to determine whether section 509 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (the "CDA") bars a defamation claim and related

  6. Section 230 - Protection for private blocking and screening of offensive material

    47 U.S.C. § 230   Cited 1,092 times   170 Legal Analyses
    Preempting state law