Β§

Amalgamated Lithographers of America

130 N.L.R.B. 985 (N.L.R.B. 1961)
Amalgamated Lithographers of America

12 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 325 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  3. Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 93 (1958)   Cited 201 times
    Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

  4. United States Smelting, Refining Mining v. Lowe

    338 U.S. 954 (1950)   Cited 51 times

    No. 489. February 13, 1950. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Facts and opinion, 175 F.2d 486, 12 Alaska 423; 176 F.2d 813, 12 Alaska 473; D.C., 66 F. Supp. 897, 11 Alaska 184; D.C., 74 F. Supp. 917, 11 Alaska 429. PER CURIAM: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The Court is of the opinion that a new trial should be granted. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to other questions presented, the judgments of the Court

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach

    228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 67 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by Β§ 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".

  6. Rabouin v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    195 F.2d 906 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 75 times
    In Rabouin v. N.L.R.B., 195 F.2d 906 (2nd Cir., 1962), Justice Clark, then a Circuit Judge, specifically held that a union's demand for damages equal in amount to the wages paid a non-union driver was not an attempted exaction in violation of Β§ 8(b)(6).

  7. Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.

    75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948)   Cited 51 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Maritime Union of America

    175 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 40 times
    Bargaining for discriminatory hiring hall clause

  9. J.G. Roy Sons Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    251 F.2d 771 (1st Cir. 1958)   Cited 21 times

    No. 5282. January 27, 1958. Lawrence M. Kearns, Boston, Mass., with whom Arthur M. Marshall, Springfield, Mass., and Morgan, Brown Kearns, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for petitioner. Norton J. Come, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit

  10. International Typographical Un. v. N.L.R.B

    278 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1960)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 5509, 5510. Heard December 2, 1959. Decided May 10, 1960. Rehearing Denied June 10, 1960. Robert M. Segal, Boston, Mass., and Gerhard Van Arkel, Washington, D.C., with whom Arthur J. Flamm, Boston, Mass., Henry Kaiser, George Kaufmann, Washington, D.C., Segal Flamm, Boston, Mass., Van Arkel Kaiser, Washington, D.C., and Dickstein, Shapiro Galligan, New York City, were on brief, for petitioners. Melvin Pollack, Washington, D.C., Atty., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott