Alternative Community Living, Inc. d/b/a New Passages Behavioral Health and Rehabilitation Services

10 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,693 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  2. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
  3. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
  4. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft
  5. Serramonte Oldsmobile, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    86 F.3d 227 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding impasse was valid where "not a single one of the Union's statements . . . actually committed the Union to a new position or contained any specific proposals"
  6. Cintas Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    482 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 13 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Hi-Way Billboards, Inc.

    500 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 20 times
    Reversing Board's finding that impasse is akin to hiatus in negotiations.
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Albion Corp.

    593 F.2d 936 (10th Cir. 1979)   Cited 6 times

    No. 77-1424. Argued September 28, 1978. Decided March 5, 1979. Howard F. Fine, Washington, D.C. (William R. Stewart and David A. Fleischer, Attys., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner-appellant. David R. Gorsuch, Denver, Colo. (James A. Jablonski, Denver, Colo., with him on the brief) for respondent-appellee

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Mayes Bros., Incorporated

    383 F.2d 242 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 11 times
    Rejecting a broad order and stating, "An order restraining Company interference `in any like or related manner' with employees' organizational rights will protect the Company from the possibility of contempt proceedings if in the future it commits some new violation unlike and unrelated to the violation now found."
  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera

    179 F.2d 749 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 24 times

    No. 54, Docket 21395. Argued December 6, 1949. Decided January 10, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays, New York City, Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for respondent. On petition of the National Labor Relations Board for an order, "enforcing" an order of the Board to "cease