Alfredia Clyde, Complainant,v.Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 7, 2008
0120082564 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 7, 2008)

0120082564

08-07-2008

Alfredia Clyde, Complainant, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.


Alfredia Clyde,

Complainant,

v.

Michael Chertoff,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120082564

Agency No. HS08CBP001384

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated April 7, 2008, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. In her complaint,

complainant alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the

bases of race (unspecified), sex (female), disability (unspecified),

age (47), and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity under an EEO

statute that was unspecified in the record when:

1. On November 8, 2007, complainant was issued a letter of proposed

removal; and

2. Approximately two weeks prior to the initial intake, individuals from

the Mission Support office provided Complainant's husband, an agency

employee, with her medical documentation they had on file without her

authorization

The agency dismissed the claims for failure to state a claim.

Specifically, the agency noted that the November 8, Removal Letter

was subsequently rescinded with no action taken. The agency analyzed

both actions under a hostile work environment theory and determined

that the actions complained of were not severe or pervasive enough

to constitute harassment. On appeal, complainant contends that the

agency has mischaracterized her claims, stating that the real issue is

that the agency provided complainant's medical information to her spouse

and refused to provide them to her representative. Following a review

of the record, including complainant's Formal and Informal complaints,

we find no compelling reason to alter the claims as currently defined.

The Commission notes that under 29 C.F.R. � 1630.14, medical information

must be kept confidential. See Enforcement Guidance on Disability Related

Inquiries and Medical Examinations of Medical Employees Under Americans

With Disabilities Act (Guidance) (July 26, 2000). We therefore find that

claim 2 states a claim. Regarding claim 1, the agency has presented

copies of a November 29, 2007 letter rescinding the Removal Letter.

We therefore find that the complaint fails to state a claim under the EEOC

regulations because complainant failed to show that she suffered harm or

loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for

which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). On appeal, complainant argues that

due to the agency's actions she incurred mental anguish and suffering.

We note that the Commission has long held that where an allegation fails

to render an individual aggrieved, the complaint is not converted into

a cognizable claim merely because complainant alleges physical and/or

emotional injury. See Larotonda v. United States Postal Service, EEOC

Appeal No. 01933846 (March 11, 1994).

Finally, we note that in her Formal Complaint, complainant included an

allegation that her complaint was mishandled. The agency is hereby

reminded of its duties pursuant to Management Directive (MD) 110,

Chapter 5, III. F. (at 5-14). Accordingly, the agency's final decision

dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed in part and reversed in

part and claim 2 is remanded for processing in accordance with the Order

set forth below.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108, and the allegation her complaint was mishandled in

accordance with MD-110, Chapter 5, III, F. The agency shall acknowledge

to the complainant that it has received the remanded claims within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final.

The agency shall issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file

and also shall notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one

hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes

final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time.

If the complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the

agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt

of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0408)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 7, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120082564

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

4

0120082564