Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

Temengil v. Trust Territory

N.L.R.B. v. Madison Courier, Inc.

Holding that "[i]f the discriminatee accepts significantly lower-paying work too soon after the discrimination in question, he may be subject to a reduction in back pay on the ground that he willfully incurred a loss by accepting an `unsuitably' low paying position"

N.L.R.B. v. Augusta Bakery Corp.

Holding that the replacements were temporary because, although the replacements were told that "if they worked out and did their job, they had a job," the testimony of the replacements indicated that they did not understand themselves to be permanent employees

Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company

Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award

Kawasaki Motors Mfg. Corp., U.S.A. v. N.L.R.B

Stating that discriminatee need only seek employment "substantially equivalent to" former job and is not required to "seek or retain a job more onerous than the job from which he or she was discharged"