Alamo Cement Co.
4 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 712 times 29 Legal AnalysesHolding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
441 U.S. 488 (1979) Cited 290 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that proposal concerning in-plant cafeteria prices was within duty to bargain despite fact that prices were set by third-party supplier rather than employer
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
711 F.2d 348 (D.C. Cir. 1983) Cited 41 timesNos. 82-1418 to 82-1420, 82-1743, 82-1589 and 82-1940. Argued May 5, 1983. Decided June 30, 1983. George H. Cohen, with whom Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for petitioners, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers, Local Union No. 6-418, AFL-CIO, et al. George J. Tichy, II, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Robert K. Carrol, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner, Borden Chemical, A Division of Borden, Inc. Howard A. Crawford, with whom Jack D. Rowe, Kansas City, Mo., was on brief, for petitioner
N.L.R.B. v. San Antonio Portland Cement Co.
611 F.2d 1148 (5th Cir. 1980) Cited 7 timesWearing of union buttons is permissible statement of personal preference