11 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.
462 U.S. 393 (1983) Cited 657 times 11 Legal AnalysesHolding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 358 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 timesHolding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener
405 U.S. 117 (1972) Cited 83 timesHolding that protection from retaliation for "fil[ing] charges or giv[ing] testimony" under the National Labor Relations Act extends to an employee who gave a written sworn statement to an NLRB examiner
Helena Laboratories Corp. v. N.L.R.B
557 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir. 1977) Cited 20 timesNo. 76-3077. August 22, 1977. George E. Duncan, Beaumont, Tex., for petitioner-cross respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen., Counsel, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, Marion Griffin, Atty., Alan Banov, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent-cross petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas Case). Before THORNBERRY, AINSWORTH and RONEY, Circuit Judges. AINSWORTH, Circuit
Hambre Hombre Enterprises, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
581 F.2d 204 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 6 timesNo. 77-1613. July 12, 1978. Rehearing Denied September 5, 1978. Ralph M. Segura, Walnut Creek, Cal., for petitioner. Paul J. Spielberg (argued), Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition to Review Final Order of the National Labor Relations Board and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and TANG, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge. Honorable William H. Orrick, United States District Judge for the Northern District
N.L.R.B. v. Fremont Mfg. Co., Inc.
558 F.2d 889 (8th Cir. 1977) Cited 5 timesFinding improper pre-petition grant of benefits conferred soon after employer learned employees were distributing authorization cards
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward
242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957) Cited 23 timesNo. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor
General Motors Corp. v. N.L.R.B
616 F.2d 967 (6th Cir. 1980)No. 77-1706. March 14, 1980. Michael J. Connolly, General Motors Corp., Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Jay Shanklin, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Michael Murchison, Washington, D.C., Emil C. Farkas, Director Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before BROWN, KENNEDY and JONES, Circuit Judges. ORDER. General Motors Corporation (GM) petitions for review of a decision and order of the NLRB. The
N.L.R.B. v. Northwestern Publishing Company
343 F.2d 521 (7th Cir. 1965) Cited 11 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Northwestern Publishing Company, 343 F.2d 521, 525 (7th Cir. 1965), the court held that "although the information might be secured from the employees themselves, this did not relieve the company from this duty [of supplying the information]."