§

Aeronca Manufacturing Corp.

118 N.L.R.B. 461 (N.L.R.B. 1957)
Aeronca Manufacturing Corp.

13 Cited authorities

  1. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  2. Labor Board v. Tower Co.

    329 U.S. 324 (1946)   Cited 260 times
    Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations

  3. Labor Board v. Rockaway News Co.

    345 U.S. 71 (1953)   Cited 128 times
    Holding that employees may bargain away their statutory right to strike

  4. Labor Board v. Virginia Power Co.

    314 U.S. 469 (1941)   Cited 169 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Virginia Electric Power Co., 314 U.S. 469, 477, 62 S.Ct. 344, 348, 86 L.Ed. 348 (1941), the Supreme court concluded that the Wagner Act could not be interpreted to prohibit an employer from exercising his First Amendment right to express his views to employees on the merits of unionization, provided the expression was neither coercive nor part of a coercive course of conduct.

  5. Seltenreich v. Town of Fairbanks

    348 U.S. 887 (1954)   Cited 70 times

    No. 271. November 22, 1954. Facts and opinion, D.C., 103 F. Supp. 319, 13 Alaska 582; 211 F.2d 83, 14 Alaska 568. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Denied.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Container

    211 F.2d 525 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 35 times
    In National Container Corp. the Second Circuit, applying the Board rules, held that an employer had interfered with the employees' organizational rights and given the incumbent union unlawful support by entering into a collective bargaining agreement following the incumbent's victory in a Board election, but at a time when the rival union's objections to the election were still pending before the National Labor Relations Board.

  7. Foreman Clark, Inc. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    215 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 30 times

    No. 13894. July 30, 1954. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter Balthis, George R. Richter, Jr., Roy Littlejohn, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie Boyls, Ruth V. Reel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HEALY, BONE and LEMMON, Circuit Judges. LEMMON, Circuit Judge. "The flattery of hope and the impressions of fear", referred to by common-law writers in connection with confessions, can intrude

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. the Newton Co.

    236 F.2d 438 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 27 times

    No. 15815. September 6, 1956. Bernard Marcus, Atty., Buffalo, N.Y., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Franklin C. Milliken, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James L. Spencer, Jackson, Miss., Andrew P. Carter, New Orleans, La., H.V. Watkins, Jackson, Miss., W. Gordon McKelvey, Nashville, Tenn., Watkins, Edwards Ludlam, Jackson

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Truck Rental

    239 F.2d 422 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 21 times
    Voiding ballot with a capital "H" on it

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bar-Brook Mfg. Co.

    220 F.2d 832 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 15 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Bar-Brook Mfg. Co., 220 F.2d 832 (5th Cir., 1953), the Court approved the Board's refusal to consider an issue which the employer attempted to raise in a "counterclaim" to the complaint issued by the General Counsel. The General Counsel had refused to include the issue in his complaint.