§

2 Sisters Food Group, Inc., and Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market, Inc.

21-CA-038915 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 21, 2012)
2 Sisters Food Group, Inc., and Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 498 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  2. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  3. Sam's Club v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    173 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 1999)   Cited 22 times

    Nos. 97-2721, 98-1085 Argued: June 3, 1998 Decided: April 9, 1999 On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (5-CA-24369, 5-CA-24618, 5-RC-14036) ARGUED: Paul Michael Thompson, HUNTON WILLIAMS, Richmond, Virginia, for Petitioner. Jill Ann Griffin, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. George Wiszynski, BUTSAVAGE ASSOCIATES, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Intervenor. ON BRIEF: Michael P. Oates, HUNTON WILLIAMS

  4. Viking Industrial Security, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    225 F.3d 131 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 2100, 2440, 98-4395, 99-4013. Argued September 1, 1999. Decided August 28, 2000. Viking Security, Inc. petitions for review of a November 30, 1998 supplemental decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board holding Viking derivatively liable for the backpay obligations of a now-dissolved company with which it once formed a "single employer." The Board cross-petitions for enforcement. Petition for review granted; petition for enforcement denied. RICHARD E. MILLER, New York, N.Y. (Kurzman

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. I.W.G

    144 F.3d 685 (10th Cir. 1998)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 96-9548, 96-9550. May 18, 1998. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (Nos. 27-CA-11771 and 27 CA-11870 for Case No. 96-9548) and (322 NLRB No. 12 for Case No. 96-9550). Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. James W. Bain (Peter A. Gergely with him on Petitioner Gordon's Opening Brief), Brega Winters P.C., Denver, Colorado, for Robert B. Gordon. Vincent J. Falvo, Jr., Attorney (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel;

  6. United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    398 F.2d 544 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 23 times

    No. 24837. July 23, 1968. John J. Coleman, Jr., A. Henry Gaede, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner; Allen Poppleton, Bradley, Arant, Rose White, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel. Benj. L. Erdreich, Birmingham, Ala., Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., Bernard Kleinman, Chicago, Ill., Elliot Bredhoff, George H. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Jerome Cooper, Birmingham, Ala., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Marine Mach. Works, Inc.

    635 F.2d 522 (5th Cir. 1981)   Cited 9 times
    In NLRB v. Marine Machine Works, Inc., 635 F.2d 522 (CA5 1981), it was concluded that the Board's policy wisely and properly weighed the competing policy concerns.