Amendments to an individualized education program pursuant to this clause shall not affect the requirement that the committee on preschool special education review the individualized education program at the annual meeting, or more often if necessary.
Notwithstanding any inconsistent provisions of this section, the committee, in its discretion, may obtain an evaluation of the child from another approved evaluator prior to making any recommendation that would place a child in the approved program that conducted the evaluation of the child. If the committee recommends placing a child in an approved program that also conducted an evaluation of such child it shall indicate in writing that such placement is an appropriate one for the child. In addition, the committee shall provide notice to the commissioner of such recommendation.
Nothing herein shall prohibit an approved evaluator from at any time providing the parent with a copy of the documentation of the evaluation provided to the committee.
A preschool child who is transitioning from part C of the individuals with disabilities education act and/or title two-A of article twenty-five of the public health law and is no longer eligible for services under part C and title two-A of article twenty-five of the public health law by reason of age, the school district or other public agency is not required to provide the services that the child had been receiving under part C and such title two-A. If the child is found eligible for special education programs and services pursuant to this section, and the parent or person in parental relation consents to the initial provision of services, then the school district or other public agency shall provide those special education programs and services that are not in dispute between the parent and the school district or other public agency.
Such reapproval process shall provide the municipality in which the program is located or for which the municipality bears fiscal responsibility, an opportunity for comment thirty or more days prior to completion of the reapproval. In collaboration with municipalities and representatives of approved programs, the commissioner shall develop procedures for conducting such reapprovals. Municipalities shall be allowed to participate in such departmental review process. Such reapprovals shall be conducted by individuals with appropriate experience as determined by the commissioner and shall be conducted not more than once every three years, unless the commissioner, on his or her own initiative or at the request of a municipality, determined that reapprovals are earlier or more frequently required. The commissioner shall commence such reapproval process no later than January fifteenth, nineteen hundred ninety-seven. Program reapprovals may result in disapproval of the entire program or a component of the program, including but not limited to the evaluation component. In reapproving a program component, such approval criteria shall include, but not be limited to: a. the extent to which the program offers services in settings with regular contact with age-appropriate peers, where appropriate to the needs of the population served; and b. whether there has been evidence of misleading or erroneous advertising.
Such reapproval shall assure an appropriate opportunity to be heard on the findings of the reapproval and the opportunity to address such findings through corrective or remedial action, where applicable. Such reapproval process shall also provide for the determination of action on the part of the department to address the findings of the reapproval which may include, but not be limited to, the withdrawal of approval to provide evaluation services.
N.Y. Educ. Law § 4410