C.r.c.p. 242.41
COMMENT
C.R.C.P. 242.41 seeks to strike a balance between protecting lawyers against publicity predicated upon unfounded accusations and protecting clients, prospective clients, and the effective administration of justice from harm caused by lawyers who do not fulfill their professional obligations. C.R.C.P. 242.41 also recognizes that restrictions on confidentiality no longer serve a purpose when allegations that ordinarily would be confidential have become generally known through publicity, disclosure in the public record, or otherwise.
The Regulation Counsel frequently receives inquiries from judges, clients, prospective clients, and the media asking if a lawyer is the subject of a pending disciplinary investigation. Ordinarily, C.R.C.P. 242.41 prohibits the Regulation Counsel from providing information about a pending investigation or even confirming that an investigation is pending. C.R.C.P. 242.41(f)(2), however, sets forth several exceptions when the Regulation Counsel may reveal the existence, subject matter, status, and any resolution of an investigation.
Two such exceptions warrant further explanation. C.R.C.P. 242.41(f)(2)(C) requires the Regulation Counsel to determine whether otherwise confidential allegations against a lawyer have become generally known. Factors that the Regulation Counsel should consider in these circumstances include the nature and extent of media coverage, the nature and extent of inquiries from the media and the public, the nature and status of any related judicial proceedings, the number of people believed to have knowledge of the allegations, and the seriousness of the allegations.
Another exception is C.R.C.P. 242.41(f)(2)(E), which allows disclosure when necessary to protect the public, the administration of justice, or the legal profession. In determining whether a need to notify exists, the Regulation Counsel should consider factors including the nature and seriousness of the conduct under investigation, the lawyer's prior disciplinary history, whether prior discipline was premised on conduct similar to the alleged conduct under investigation, and the potential harm to a client, a prospective client, the public, or the judicial system. In those instances in which the Regulation Counsel determines that disclosure is permitted under C.R.C.P. 242.41(f)(2)(E), the Regulation Counsel is authorized not only to disclose the existence, subject matter, status, and any resolution of an investigation in response to an inquiry, but also to disclose this information affirmatively to those persons having a need to know the information in order to avoid potential harm.