From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zylinski v. Dinunzio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1090 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

717 CAF 17–01977

08-22-2019

In the Matter of Charlene N. ZYLINSKI, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Michael E. DINUNZIO, Respondent–Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.)

CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER–APPELLANT. HOGANWILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (REBECCA M. KUJAWA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT–RESPONDENT.


CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER–APPELLANT.

HOGANWILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (REBECCA M. KUJAWA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT–RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND CURRAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is dismissed except insofar as Charlene N. Zylinski challenges the validity of her waiver of the right to counsel, and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of DiNunzio v. Zylinski (Appeal No. 1) ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2019 WL 3955273 (Aug. 22, 2019) (4th Dept. 2019) ).

Whalen, P.J., Peradotto and Lindley, JJ., concur;

Curran, J., dissents and votes to dismiss appeal Nos. 1–5 in the same dissenting memorandum as in Matter of DiNunzio v. Zylinski (Appeal No. 1) ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2019 WL 3955273 (Aug. 22, 2019) (4th Dept. 2019) ;

Carni, J., dissents and votes to dismiss appeal Nos. 1–5 in the same dissenting memorandum as in Matter of DiNunzio v. Zylinski (Appeal No. 1) ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2019 WL 3955273 (Aug. 22, 2019) (4th Dept. 2019).


Summaries of

Zylinski v. Dinunzio

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1090 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Zylinski v. Dinunzio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Charlene N. ZYLINSKI, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Michael E…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 22, 2019

Citations

175 A.D.3d 1090 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
105 N.Y.S.3d 333