From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zucker v. Whitridge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1916
172 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

January, 1916.

Present — Clarke, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Page, JJ.


We have carefully examined the evidence and find no substantial or material difference between that given upon the present trial and that given upon the former trial, as to which the Court of Appeals said: "A majority of the judges are of the opinion that the decedent, upon the most favorable view of the evidence that can be taken in the interest of the plaintiff, was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law." Relying, therefore, upon the opinion above quoted ( 205 N.Y. 50), we are constrained to affirm the order and judgment. The order and judgment should be affirmed, with costs.


Order and judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Zucker v. Whitridge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1916
172 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Zucker v. Whitridge

Case Details

Full title:LOUISE ZUCKER, as Administratrix, etc., of SIMON ZUCKER, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1916

Citations

172 App. Div. 903 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)