From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zorn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 4, 1959
167 Tex. Crim. 502 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)

Opinion

No. 30479.

March 4, 1959.

Appeal from the 30th Judicial District Court, Wichita County, Graham B. Purcell, Jr., J.

Spence Martin, Wichita Falls, for appellant.

L. T. Wilson, Dist. Atty., Wichita Falls, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The conviction is for keeping and exhibiting a gaming table and bank for the purpose of gaming; the punishment, two years.

The disposition hereof makes a summary of the facts unnecessary.

Formal Bill of Exception No. 3 shows that the trial court permitted the state to introduce the affidavit, search warrant and return made thereon into evidence before the jury over appellant's objection that they were hearsay. Such instruments were hearsay and prejudicial to the rights of the appellant; should not have been admitted in evidence before the jury, and calls for a reversal. 37-B Tex.Jur. 489, Sec. 36; 3 Branch's Ann.P.C.2d 106, Sec. 1335; Hall v. State, 136 Tex.Crim. R., 125 S.W.2d 293; Byars v. State, 154 Tex.Crim. R., 229 S.W.2d 169; Hebert v. State, 157 Tex.Crim. R., 249 S.W.2d 925; McGowan v. State, 158 Tex.Crim. R., 255 S.W.2d 512.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Zorn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 4, 1959
167 Tex. Crim. 502 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
Case details for

Zorn v. State

Case Details

Full title:Leroy ZORN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 4, 1959

Citations

167 Tex. Crim. 502 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
167 Tex. Crim. 502

Citing Cases

Zorn v. State

The conviction is for keeping and exhibiting a table for the purpose of gaming; the punishment, two years.…

Tucker v. State

The affidavit was clearly hearsay and, under the record presented, its admission in evidence was error and…