From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zipkin v. Hendler

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
182 A. 843 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Submitted October 25, 1935 —

Decided January 31, 1936.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 13 N.J. Mis. R. 684, sub nom. Hendler v. Meadows.

For the respondent, Louis Spiegel and Emanuel Ehrenkranz.

For the appellants, McCarter English.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Zipkin v. Hendler

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
182 A. 843 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Zipkin v. Hendler

Case Details

Full title:GOLDIE ZIPKIN, RESPONDENT, v. MEYER HENDLER ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 1936

Citations

182 A. 843 (N.J. 1936)
116 N.J.L. 137

Citing Cases

Cermak v. Hertz Corp.

Such a holding is not unknown, however. In the case of Hendler v. Meadows, 13 N.J. Misc. 684; affirmed,…

Burr v. Metropolitan Distributors, Inc.

To the contrary, directed verdicts for plaintiffs in negligence cases have been previously upheld by this…