From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zinsmeister v. Stelz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 1950
277 App. Div. 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Opinion

May 8, 1950.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.


In an action for dissolution of a partnership between plaintiff and defendant, and for an accounting of the partnership affairs, judgment dismissing the complaint, after trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The finding that plaintiff abandoned the partnership business in April, 1931, is sustained by the evidence. His right to relief is barred not only by the ten-year Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prac. Act, § 53), but also by laches. ( Gilmore v. Ham, 142 N.Y. 1; Hutchinson v. Sperry, 158 App. Div. 704, affd. 214 N.Y. 616; Lindley on Partnership [10th ed.], p. 560; cf. Bankers Trust Co. v. Dennis, 256 App. Div. 495, 503, affd. 282 N.Y. 635.)


Summaries of

Zinsmeister v. Stelz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 1950
277 App. Div. 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)
Case details for

Zinsmeister v. Stelz

Case Details

Full title:JACOB ZINSMEISTER, Appellant, v. JOHN STELZ, JR., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 8, 1950

Citations

277 App. Div. 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1950)

Citing Cases

Schlesinger v. Schlesinger

As a partnership-at-will since it continued its business after that date it can be dissolved at any time by…