From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zingale v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Apr 4, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-182-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Apr. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-182-FtM-29SPC

04-04-2012

VICKIE C. ZINGALE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #15), filed on March 12, 2012, recommending that the Commissioner's decision to deny social security disability benefits be affirmed. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

The Court reviews the Commissioner's decision to determine if it is supported by substantial evidence and based upon proper legal standards. Crawford v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 363 F.3d 1155, 1158 (11th Cir. 2004). Substantial evidence is more than a scintilla but less than a preponderance, and is such relevant evidence as a reasonable person would accept as adequate to support a conclusion. Moore v. Barnhart, 405 F.3d 1208, 1211 (11th Cir. 2005); Crawford, 363 F.3d at 1158. Even if the evidence preponderates against the Commissioner's findings, the Court must affirm if the decision reached is supported by substantial evidence. Crawford, 363 F.3d at 1158-59. The Court does not decide facts anew, make credibility judgments, reweigh the evidence, or substitute its judgment for that of the Commissioner. Moore, 405 F.3d at 1211; Dyer v. Barnhart, 395 F.3d 1206, 1210 (11th Cir. 2005). The magistrate judge, district judge and appellate judges all apply the same legal standards to the review of the Commissioner's decision. Dyer, 395 F.3d at 1210; Shinn v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 391 F.3d 1276, 1282 (11th Cir. 2004); Phillips v. Barnhart, 357 F.3d 1232, 1240 n.8 (11th Cir. 2004). After an independent review, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #15) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

2. The Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 4th day of April, 2012.

Copies:

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of Record

_______________

JOHN E. STEELE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Zingale v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Apr 4, 2012
Case No. 2:11-cv-182-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Apr. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Zingale v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:VICKIE C. ZINGALE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Apr 4, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-182-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Apr. 4, 2012)