In Zimmerman v. Dieckerhoff, 12 N.Y. St. Repr. 613, the court says: "In no view should the defendants be permitted to conceal or withhold any information from the plaintiffs derivable from the books of account, letters or papers of the firm.
Summary of this case from Fleischmann v. FleischmannArgued January 31, 1888
Decided February 7, 1888
Hector M. Hitchings for motion.
C.A. Davison opposed.
Agree to dismiss appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.
In Zimmerman v. Dieckerhoff, 12 N.Y. St. Repr. 613, the court says: "In no view should the defendants be permitted to conceal or withhold any information from the plaintiffs derivable from the books of account, letters or papers of the firm.
Summary of this case from Fleischmann v. FleischmannFull title:LOUISE ZIMMERMAN, et al., Respondents, v . EMIL DIECKERHOFF et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 7, 1888
he granting of the motion rests in the sound discretion of the court and it is difficult to abstract a…
Fleischmann v. Fleischmann" See, also, Livingston v. Curtis, 12 Hun, 121; Martine v. Albro, 26 id. 559; Veiller v. Oppenheim, 26 N.Y.S.…