Zilinskas v. UPMC

2 Citing cases

  1. Keller v. Sierra-Cedar, LLC

    4:22-CV-00013 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2024)

    See e.g., Hayes v. New Jersey, No. 1:20-CV-17075-KMW-MJS, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68313 (D.N.J. Apr. 19, 2023). Moses, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99799, at *13 (citing Zilinskas v. UPMC, Civ. A. No. 13-80, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71383, at *4 (W.D. Pa. May 21, 2013)). A. Agency Law

  2. Moses v. Home Depot Inc.

    Civil Action No. 16-2400 (MAS) (DEA) (D.N.J. Jun. 27, 2017)   Cited 12 times
    Granting motion to dismiss where complaint was filed after 90-day period because the date email was received in plaintiff's inbox is the date of receipt

    A right-to-sue letter received via e-mail message triggers the ninety-day statute of limitations period. See Zilinskas v. UPMC, No. 13-80, 2013 WL 2237726, at *4 (W.D. Pa. May 21, 2013) (finding that the plaintiff had ninety days from the date of receipt of right-to-sue letter via e-mail message from the EEOC). The ninety-day statute of limitations is "strictly enforced."