From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zhu v. Wang

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 4, 2024
No. C23-1395-JCC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 4, 2024)

Opinion

C23-1395-JCC

04-04-2024

ZHIJIE ZHU, Plaintiff, v. SHU-MEI WANG, et al., Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. Coughenour, United States District Judge:

This matter comes before the Court on Counsel Danial D Pharris and Paul J Spadafora's motion to withdraw as attorneys to multiple Defendants (Dkt. No. 12). Pursuant to LCR 83.2(b)(6), Counsel seeking to withdraw representation from business entities, excepts sole proprietorships, must certify to the Court that they have advised all such business entities that they are required by law to be represented by an attorney admitted to practice before this Court and that failure to obtain replacement counsel by the date that the withdrawal is effective may result in dismissal of any of the business entities' claims and/or entry of default against them. The Court has not received any such certification.

Counsel are thus INSTRUCTED to file the required certification under LCR 83.2(b)(6) within seven days of this minute order.


Summaries of

Zhu v. Wang

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 4, 2024
No. C23-1395-JCC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Zhu v. Wang

Case Details

Full title:ZHIJIE ZHU, Plaintiff, v. SHU-MEI WANG, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Apr 4, 2024

Citations

No. C23-1395-JCC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 4, 2024)