Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Zepp v. State

276 Ga. App. 466 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Zepp v. State

5 Citing cases

  1. State v. Lane

    308 Ga. 10 (Ga. 2020)   Cited 195 times
    Holding that "Georgia courts considering whether a criminal defendant is entitled to a new trial should consider collectively the prejudicial effect of trial court errors"

    S.E.2d 827 (2008) ; Cail v. State , 287 Ga. App. 547, 551 (3), 652 S.E.2d 190 (2007) ; Ingram v. State , 286 Ga. App. 662, 665 (4), 650 S.E.2d 743 (2007) ; Venegas v. State , 285 Ga. App. 768, 771 (4), 647 S.E.2d 422 (2007) ; Ojemuyiwa v. State , 285 Ga. App. 617, 622 (5), 647 S.E.2d 598 (2007) ; Johnson v. State , 283 Ga. App. 524, 532 (8) n.4, 642 S.E.2d 170 (2007) ; Fraser v. State , 283 Ga. App. 477, 482 (4), 642 S.E.2d 129 (2007) *; Anderson v. State , 282 Ga. App. 58, 62 (3), 637 S.E.2d 790 (2006) *; Ellis v. State , 282 Ga. App. 17, 20 (2), 637 S.E.2d 729 (2006) *; Fields v. State , 281 Ga. App. 733, 737 (2), 637 S.E.2d 136 (2006) *; Hutchens v. State , 281 Ga. App. 610, 613 (2), 636 S.E.2d 773 (2006) *; Callahan v. State , 280 Ga. App. 323, 324, 634 S.E.2d 102 (2006) ; Tyler v. State , 279 Ga. App. 809, 812 (3), 632 S.E.2d 716 (2006) *; Frazier v. State , 278 Ga. App. 685, 690 (3), 629 S.E.2d 568 (2006) *; Davenport v. State , 278 Ga. App. 16, 19 (2), 628 S.E.2d 120 (2006) *; Zepp v. State , 276 Ga. App. 466, 475 (5), 623 S.E.2d 569 (2005) *; Fitz v. State , 275 Ga. App. 817, 824-825 (4), 622 S.E.2d 46 (2005) *; Stapp v. State , 273 Ga. App. 899, 901 n.2, 616 S.E.2d 215 (2005) *; Cornelius v. State , 273 Ga. App. 806, 808 (2), 616 S.E.2d 148 (2005) *; Brooks v. State , 273 Ga. App. 691, 695 (4), 615 S.E.2d 829 (2005) *; Garcia v. State , 271 Ga. App. 794, 797 (2) n.7, 611 S.E.2d 92 (2005) ; Weeks v. State , 270 Ga. App. 889, 891 (1) (a), 608 S.E.2d 259 (2004) ; Howren v. State , 271 Ga. App. 55, 58 (5), 608 S.E.2d 653 (2004) *; Dixon v. State , 268 Ga. App. 215, 219 (2), 601 S.E.2d 748 (2004) *; Richey v. State , 261 Ga. App. 720, 726 (4), 583 S.E.2d 539 (2003) ; Pollard v. State , 260 Ga. App. 540, 542 (2), 580 S.E.2d 337 (2003) ; Hodges v. State , 260 Ga. App. 483, 487 (5), 580 S.E.2d 614 (2003) *; Baker v. State , 259 Ga. App. 433, 435 (3), 577 S.E.2d 282 (2003) *; Phyfer v. State , 259 Ga. App. 356, 362 (7), 577 S.E.2d 56 (2003) ; Torres v. State , 258 Ga. App. 393, 395 n.6, 574 S.E.2d 438

  2. Schofield v. Holsey

    281 Ga. 809 (Ga. 2007)   Cited 153 times
    Holding that "[t]o prevail on his claims," the appellant "must show that his trial counsel rendered constitutionally-deficient performance and that actual prejudice resulted"

    Accordingly, the cases in which the Court of Appeals has held that the cumulative effect of counsel's errors should not be considered are disapproved. See Anderson v. State, 282 Ga. App. 58, 62 (3) ( 637 SE2d 790) (2006); Fields v. State, 281 Ga. App. 733, 737 (2) ( 637 SE2d 136) (2006); Hutchens v. State, 281 Ga. App. 610, 613 (2) ( 636 SE2d 773) (2006); Tyler v. State, 279 Ga. App. 809, 812 (3) ( 632 SE2d 716) (2006); Frazier v. State, 278 Ga. App. 685, 690 (3) ( 629 SE2d 568) (2006); Davenport v. State, 278 Ga. App. 16, 19 (2) ( 628 SE2d 120) (2006); Zepp v. State, 276 Ga. App. 466, 475 (5) ( 623 SE2d 569) (2005); Fitz v. State, 275 Ga. App. 817, 824-825 (4) ( 622 SE2d 46) (2005); Cornelius v. State, 273 Ga. App. 806, 808 (2) ( 616 SE2d 148) (2005); Brooks v. State, 273 Ga. App. 691, 695 (4) ( 615 SE2d 829) (2005); Howren v. State, 271 Ga. App. 55, 58 (5) ( 608 SE2d 653) (2004); Hodges v. State, 260 Ga. App. 483, 486-487 (5) ( 580 SE2d 614) (2003); Baker v. State, 259 Ga. App. 433, 435 (3) ( 577 SE2d 282) (2003); Whited v. State, 258 Ga. App. 195, 200 (8) ( 573 SE2d 449) (2002); Holland v. State, 250 Ga. App. 24, 28 (4) ( 550 SE2d 433) (2001); Osborne v. State, 239 Ga. App. 308, 309 (1) ( 521 SE2d 226) (1999); Johnson v. State, 236 Ga. App. 61, 66 (3) (e) ( 510 SE2d 918) (1999); Carl v. State, 234 Ga. App. 61, 65 (2) (g) ( 506 SE2d 207) (1998). Although the combined effects of trial counsel's errors should be considered together as one issue, it remains the case that "[t]his State does not recognize the cumulative error rule."

  3. Lavalley v. State

    369 Ga. App. 182 (Ga. Ct. App. 2023)

    However, it is well settled that the right to face-to-face confrontation is not absolute. Maryland v. Craig , 497 U. S. 836, 844 (II), 110 S.Ct. 3157, 111 L.Ed.2d 666 (1990) ; see also Zepp v. State , 276 Ga. App. 466, 469 (4) (a), 623 S.E.2d 569 (2005), overruled on other grounds by State v. Lane , 308 Ga. 10, 23-24, 838 S.E.2d 808 (2020). But,

  4. Berman v. State

    279 Ga. App. 867 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 20 times

    (Punctuation omitted.) Zepp v. State, 276 Ga. App. 466, 473 (4) (c) ( 623 SE2d 569) (2005). See id. at (4) (c) (ii).

  5. Iles v. State

    278 Ga. App. 895 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 2 times

    Iles testified that he was arrested on June 13, 2001, and the record shows that his trial commenced on November 12, 2002. See Zepp v. State, 276 Ga. App. 466, 474 (4) (e) ( 623 SE2d 569) (2005) (to support an ineffective assistance claim, the defendant must show that "counsel's performance, assuming it was deficient, harmed [him]").Judgment affirmed.