From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zepeda v. Hubbard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-1757 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1757 KJM AC P

02-27-2013

SANTOS ZEPEDA, Petitioner, v. SUZAN L. HUBBARD, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se on his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court previously directed respondent to file a response to the petition (ECF No. 9), and the parties have completed briefing.

Petitioner now moves to supplement his traverse by adding an additional declaration. ECF No. 23. Respondent has not objected to petitioner's motion. Accordingly, the court will grant petitioner's motion to supplement his traverse. Petitioner is advised that, in granting this application to supplement, the court makes no determination about the value of the declaration, or its weight in deciding the pending petition.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to file a supplemental Exhibit B to his traverse (ECF No. 23) is granted.

____________________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Zepeda v. Hubbard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-1757 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Zepeda v. Hubbard

Case Details

Full title:SANTOS ZEPEDA, Petitioner, v. SUZAN L. HUBBARD, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1757 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)