Zenov v. Greenberg, Traurig, Askew

Full title: EUGENE ZENOV, APPELLANT, v. GREENBERG, TRAURIG, ASKEW, HOFFMAN, LIPOFF…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 12, 1984

451 So. 2d 954 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-2894.

June 12, 1984.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Sam I. Silver, Judge.

Sidney L. Syna, Miami, for appellant.

Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick Hoehl and James C. Blecke, Miami, for appellee Greenberg, Traurig, Askew, Hoffman, Lipoff, Quentel Wolff, P.A.

Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The final order of dismissal under review is affirmed with one modification, to wit: the dismissal herein shall be without prejudice to the plaintiff to file an amended complaint in which the defendants Greenberg, Traurig, Askew, Hoffman, Lipoff, Quentel Wolff, P.A. are sued solely as nominal party stakeholders of the security deposit herein. See Ullendorff v. Graham, 80 Fla. 845, 852, 87 So. 50, 53 (1920); Lewis v. Howanitz, 378 So.2d 310, 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Ayers v. Homeowners Ass'n of Killearn Estates, 360 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Ossinsky v. Nance, 118 So.2d 47, 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960).

Affirmed as modified.