From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zeng Ji Liu v. Bathily

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 15, 2016
145 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

12-15-2016

ZENG JI LIU, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Djibril BATHILY, et al., Defendants, All Taxi Management, Inc., Defendant–Appellant.

Cobert, Haber & Haber, LLP, Garden City (David C. Haber of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth J. Gorman, Esq. PC, New York (Kenneth J. Gorman of counsel), for respondent.


Cobert, Haber & Haber, LLP, Garden City (David C. Haber of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth J. Gorman, Esq. PC, New York (Kenneth J. Gorman of counsel), for respondent.

ACOSTA, J.P., ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, GISCHE, WEBBER, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered June 3, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, in this action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when he was struck by a vehicle operated by defendant Djibril Bathily, denied the motion of defendant All Taxi Management, Inc. (All Taxi) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

All Taxi's management of the taxicab medallion, without more, is insufficient to raise triable issues of fact regarding an employment relationship with Bathily. The record shows, inter alia, that All Taxi leased the medallion to Bathily and that the lease agreement expressly disclaims the existence an employer- employee relationship. Moreover, Bathily was not guaranteed compensation, worked without a fixed schedule, and was free from All Taxi's direction and control (see Bynog v. Cipriani Group, 1 N.Y.3d 193, 198, 770 N.Y.S.2d 692, 802 N.E.2d 1090 [2003] ; Piaseczny v. Bartolo, 271 A.D.2d 267, 707 N.Y.S.2d 45 [1st Dept.2000] ). All Taxi's background check of Bathily, its weekly inspections of the vehicle, and acceptance of credit card payments on Bathily's behalf are all "indicative of mere incidental or general supervisory control that does not rise to the level of an employer-employee relationship" (Chaouni v. Ali, 105 A.D.3d 424, 425, 963 N.Y.S.2d 27 [1st Dept.2013] [internal quotation marks omitted] ).

We have considered plaintiffs' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Zeng Ji Liu v. Bathily

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 15, 2016
145 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Zeng Ji Liu v. Bathily

Case Details

Full title:ZENG JI LIU, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Djibril BATHILY, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 15, 2016

Citations

145 A.D.3d 558 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
43 N.Y.S.3d 335
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8454

Citing Cases

People v. N. Leasing Sys.

The Northern Leasing respondents' application process for ISOs is nothing more than overall management or…

Maor v. One Fifty Fifty Seven Corp.

Although they were assigned to work the events by Ambitious, a third-party staffing agency, triable issues of…