Opinion
Nos. 4D14–2730 4D14–3848.
09-02-2015
Lois ZELMAN, Appellant, v. Martin ZELMAN, Robert Zelman, individually and as co-guardian of the property of Martin Zelman, Lisa Held, individually and as limited guardian of the person of Martin Zelman, and Curtis Rogers, as co-guardian of the property of Martin Zelman, Appellees.
Philip M. Burlington and Nichole J. Segal of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., and J. Grier Pressly III of Pressly & Pressly, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. Matthew Triggs and Jessica Zietz of Proskauer Rose, LLP, Boca Raton, and Patricia K. Allen of Patricia K. Allen, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee, Martin Zelman. Jane Kreusler–Walsh and Rebecca Mercier Vargas of Kreusler–Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A., West Palm Beach, Peter A. Sachs of Jones, Foster, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Michael W. Connors of Michael W. Connors, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellees, Robert Zelman, individually and as co-guardian of the property of Martin Zelman, Lisa Held, individually, and as limited guardian of the person of Martin Zelman, and Curtis Rogers, as co-guardian of the property of Martin Zelman.
Philip M. Burlington and Nichole J. Segal of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., and J. Grier Pressly III of Pressly & Pressly, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Matthew Triggs and Jessica Zietz of Proskauer Rose, LLP, Boca Raton, and Patricia K. Allen of Patricia K. Allen, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee, Martin Zelman.
Jane Kreusler–Walsh and Rebecca Mercier Vargas of Kreusler–Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A., West Palm Beach, Peter A. Sachs of Jones, Foster, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Michael W. Connors of Michael W. Connors, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellees, Robert Zelman, individually and as co-guardian of the property of Martin Zelman, Lisa Held, individually, and as limited guardian of the person of Martin Zelman, and Curtis Rogers, as co-guardian of the property of Martin Zelman.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
These consolidated appeals are of two orders in the same guardianship proceeding where we have reversed orders in related cases. See Zelman v. Zelman, No. 4D14–1858, 2015 WL 4002241 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), reh'g denied (Aug. 18, 2015); and Zelman v. Zelman, Nos. 4D14–1851 and 4D14–1887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). We reverse the orders of June 9, 2014 and September 12, 2014. We note that the source of funds used to finance the divorce should be determined by the judge in the divorce case, pursuant to Chapter 61, Florida Statutes (2015).
STEVENSON, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.