From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zdanis v. Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1997
238 A.D.2d 334 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 7, 1997


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated April 15, 1996, which granted the motion of the defendant Town of Islip for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and (2) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated September 4, 1996, as denied their motion, in effect, for leave to reargue.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 4, 1996, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated April 15, 1996, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The plaintiff Rina Zdanis was injured when she fell on a raised sidewalk on Connetquot Avenue in the Town of Islip. The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint as the plaintiffs failed to establish that actual written notice of the defect was given to the Town Clerk or the Commissioner of Highways in accordance with Town Law § 65-a and Town of Islip Code § 47A-3. Furthermore, the Town cannot be charged with notice of the defect because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that an inspection of the subject area took place prior to the accident ( see, Jones v. Town of Brookhaven, 227 A.D.2d 530; Ferris v. County of Suffolk, 174 A.D.2d 70; Klimek v. Town of Ghent, 114 A.D.2d 614).

The plaintiffs' motion, denominated one for leave to renew, was based on information which readily and with due diligence could have been presented as part of their opposition to the original motion, and the plaintiffs have offered no excuse for failing to present the evidence at that time. It was therefor in actuality a motion for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable ( see, Mgrditchian v. Donata, 141 A.D.2d 513; Chiarella v. Quitoni, 178 A.D.2d 502; Foley v. Roche, 68 A.D.2d 558).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J.P., Friedmann, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zdanis v. Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1997
238 A.D.2d 334 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Zdanis v. Town of Islip

Case Details

Full title:RINA ZDANIS et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF ISLIP, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 334 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
656 N.Y.S.2d 914

Citing Cases

Zdanis v. Town of Islip

Decided September 16, 1997 Reported below, 238 A.D.2d 334. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from…

Hassell v. New York

The court denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to renew, holding that the plaintiff failed to advance any…