From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zavala v. San Diego Sheriff

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Nov 9, 2021
3:21-cv-01104-GPC-RBM (S.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2021)

Opinion

3:21-cv-01104-GPC-RBM

11-09-2021

DANNY ZAVALA, Booking No. 21103200, Plaintiff, v. SAN DIEGO SHERIFF, Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION FOR FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM AND FOR FAILING TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER

Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel United States District Judge

I. Introduction

On June 11, 2021, Danny Arroyo Zavala (“Plaintiff”), who is proceeding pro se, was housed at San Diego Central Jail and filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in this Court. (See ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (See ECF No. 2.)

The Court granted Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), and granted him sixty (60) days from the date of the dismissal Order to file a First Amended Complaint. (See ECF No. 3.)

II. Discussion

Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint was due on or before August 21, 2021. To date, he has failed to amend, and has not requested another extension of time in which to do so. “The failure of the plaintiff eventually to respond to the court's ultimatum-either by amending the complaint or by indicating to the court that [he] will not do so-is properly met with the sanction of a Rule 41(b) dismissal.” Edwards v. Marin Park, 356 F.3d 1058, 1065 (9th Cir. 2004).

III. Conclusion and Order

Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this civil action in its entirety based on Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1915A(b)(1) for the reasons set forth in the Court's June 21, 2021 Order, and his failure to prosecute as required by Court's Order.

The Court further CERTIFIES that an IFP appeal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and DIRECTS the Clerk to enter a final judgment of dismissal and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Zavala v. San Diego Sheriff

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Nov 9, 2021
3:21-cv-01104-GPC-RBM (S.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Zavala v. San Diego Sheriff

Case Details

Full title:DANNY ZAVALA, Booking No. 21103200, Plaintiff, v. SAN DIEGO SHERIFF…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Nov 9, 2021

Citations

3:21-cv-01104-GPC-RBM (S.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2021)