From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zavala v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2013
No. 12:11-cv-2475-KJM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. 12:11-cv-2475-KJM-CMK-P

01-08-2013

JOSE B. ZAVALA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL D. MCDONALD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 26, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 26, 2012 are adopted in full; and

2. Gower is dismissed as a defendant to this action.

______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Zavala v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 8, 2013
No. 12:11-cv-2475-KJM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Zavala v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:JOSE B. ZAVALA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL D. MCDONALD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 8, 2013

Citations

No. 12:11-cv-2475-KJM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2013)