From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zauderer v. Market Street Long Beach Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

June, 1929.


Judgment reversed on the law, and judgment directed for plaintiff, with costs. Finding of fact 6 and conclusions of law 3, 4, 5 and 6 are reversed and plaintiff's proposed findings of fact numbered 6 to 13, both inclusive, and conclusions of law numbered 3 to 7, both inclusive, found. This court is of the opinion that the plaintiff established a prima facie case of infancy ( Koester v. Rochester Candy Works, 194 N.Y. 92), and the defendants defaulting, and no testimony being offered in contradiction of the plaintiff's proof, the learned trial court was not at liberty to disregard it. ( Hull v. Littauer, 162 N.Y. 569.) In view of this decision the appeal from the order denying motion for a new trial is dismissed. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zauderer v. Market Street Long Beach Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Zauderer v. Market Street Long Beach Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SOLOMON ZAUDERER, Infant, by GEORGE ZAUDERER, Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1929

Citations

227 App. Div. 626 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Pell v. Lombardi

Defendant's testimony should not have been disregarded. ( Hull v. Littauer, 162 N.Y. 569, 572; Gnichtel v.…