From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zastrow v. Department of Revenue

Tax Court of Oregon
Dec 28, 2016
TC-MD 160347R (Or. T.C. Dec. 28, 2016)

Opinion

TC-MD 160347R

12-28-2016

AMY ZASTROW and JEFFREY KOWALCZYK, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant.


FINAL DECISION

This Final Decision incorporates without change the court's Decision, entered December 6, 2016, signed by Magistrate Davis. The court did not receive a statement of costs and disbursements within 14 days after its Decision was entered. See Tax Court Rule-Magistrate Division (TCR-MD) 16 C(1).

ALLISON R. BOOMER, MAGISTRATE

This matter came before the court on Defendant's Answer, filed November 30, 2016. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on October 27, 2016, appealing Defendant's Notice of Proposed Refund Offset dated September 16, 2016. In their Complaint, Plaintiffs requested that a rural health practitioner credit of $5,000 be allowed for the 2015 tax year, resulting in an additional refund of $3,200. (Compl at 1.) In its Answer, Defendant wrote that Plaintiffs had "updated [their] 2015 tax return with the provided information." (Answer at 1.) Defendant therefore agreed to "issue the additional refund * * *." (Id.) Because the parties are in agreement, the case is ready for decision. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that, for tax year 2015, Plaintiffs are allowed a rural health practitioner credit of $5,000. Defendant shall issue any applicable refund to Plaintiffs with statutory interest.


Summaries of

Zastrow v. Department of Revenue

Tax Court of Oregon
Dec 28, 2016
TC-MD 160347R (Or. T.C. Dec. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Zastrow v. Department of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:AMY ZASTROW and JEFFREY KOWALCZYK, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE…

Court:Tax Court of Oregon

Date published: Dec 28, 2016

Citations

TC-MD 160347R (Or. T.C. Dec. 28, 2016)