From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zarro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 3, 1980
390 So. 2d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 80-111.

December 3, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Brevard County, Tom Waddell, Jr., J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Martin Colin, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Phillip D. Havens, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Zarro appeals his judgment and sentence after being convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon. He was sentenced to 15 years with a requirement that he serve a mandatory minimum sentence of 3 years pursuant to section 775.087, Florida Statutes (1979).

Section 775.087 states, in pertinent part:
(2) Any person who is convicted of: (a) Any . . . robbery . . . Who had in his possession a "firearm," . . . shall be sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment of 3 calendar years.

We reject Zarro's contention that the evidence at trial was insufficient to sustain his conviction. The evidence showed that Zarro and an accomplice robbed one store employee while another accomplice robbed the pharmacist. The three men joined each other in the middle of the store and ran out together. This evidence was sufficient to uphold the jury verdict and the judgment of guilty is affirmed.

However the requirement that Zarro serve a 3 year mandatory minimum sentence must be reversed. Section 775.087, Florida Statutes (1979) requires the imposition of the mandatory minimum sentence for possession of a firearm during the commission of certain enumerated crimes including robbery. For section 775.087 to apply, the defendant must have a firearm in his actual, not vicarious possession. Earnest v. State, 351 So.2d 957 (Fla. 1977); Arthur v. State, 351 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). Zarro's accomplice was carrying a firearm, but Zarro was not. Because the firearm was not in Zarro's possession section 775.087 is not applicable. This cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur.


Summaries of

Zarro v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 3, 1980
390 So. 2d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Zarro v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT ZARRO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 3, 1980

Citations

390 So. 2d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

McRae v. State

That portion of the sentence which imposed the mandatory minimum three year sentence pursuant to section…

Marshall v. State

No illegality occurs where, as here, a defendant is convicted of an armed felony even though he is not the…