From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zappin v. Collazo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 22, 2020
19 CIVIL 3781 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 3781 (LGS) 19 CIVIL 10573 (LGS)

09-22-2020

ANTHONY ZAPPIN, Plaintiff, v. EREST COLLAZO, Defendans. ANTHONY ZAPPIN, Plaintiff, v. ERNEST COLLAZO, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated September 22, 2020, the Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties, and to the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit; Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED, both actions Zappin I (19 Civ. 03781) and Zappin II (19 Civ. 10573 are dismissed, and both cases are closed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Dated: New York, New York

September 22, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Zappin v. Collazo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 22, 2020
19 CIVIL 3781 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Zappin v. Collazo

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY ZAPPIN, Plaintiff, v. EREST COLLAZO, Defendans. ANTHONY ZAPPIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 22, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 3781 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 22, 2020)