Zamora v. Jones

Full title: ANTHONY ZAMORA, JR., Plaintiff, v. SCOTT JONES, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 14, 2015

2:14-cv-2731 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2015)

Opinion

ANTHONY ZAMORA, JR., Plaintiff, v. SCOTT JONES, et al., Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-2731 KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. April 14, 2015

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed February 26, 2015, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

         Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).