From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zakutny v. Gomez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1999
258 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 8, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant was under a duty to maintain a safe distance between his vehicle and the vehicle operated by the plaintiff Michael Zakutny ( see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 Veh. Traf. [a]). The defendant's failure to do so, in the absence of an adequate explanation, constituted negligence as a matter of law which caused the accident ( see, Rebecchi v. Whitmore, 172 A.D.2d 600). In opposition to the motion, the defendant failed to submit his own statement describing the circumstances surrounding the accident.

The medical evidence the defendant submitted in support of his cross motion failed to establish a prima facie case that Michael Zakutny did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) ( see, Mendola v. Demetres, 212 A.D.2d 515).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

O'Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zakutny v. Gomez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1999
258 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Zakutny v. Gomez

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ZAKUTNY et al., Respondents, v. JOSE A. GOMEZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 8, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 255

Citing Cases

Velasquez v. Quijada

Thus, the defendants' motion for summary judgment must be denied (see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955;Meyer v.…

Hernandez v. Burkitt

The defendant was under a duty to maintain a safe distance between his vehicle and the vehicle operated by…