From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zahran v. Bank of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION
Jan 8, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-00427-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-00427-MOC-DSC

01-08-2021

GINA ZAHRAN, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., Defendant.


ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on "Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint" (document #18), as well as the parties' briefs and exhibits. Defendant has also filed a "Motion to Dismiss" and "Motion to Strike" (documents ##9 and 11).

Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs amendments to pleadings. Rule 15(a)(1) grants a party the right to "amend its pleading once as a matter of course," if done within twenty-one days after serving the pleading, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A), or "if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required," a party may amend once as a matter of course, provided that it does so within "21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier." Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). The Rule further provides that leave to amend shall be freely given "when justice so requires." Id.

For the reasons stated therein, the Court grants Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint.

It is well settled that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading and that motions directed at superseded pleadings are to be denied as moot. Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F. 3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (amended pleading renders original pleading of no effect); Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motion to dismiss original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. "Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint" (document #18) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file her Amended Complaint within five days of this Order.

2. Defendant's "Motion to Dismiss" and "Motion to Strike" (documents ##9 and 11) are administratively DENIED as moot without prejudice.

3. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for the parties and to the Honorable Max O. Cogburn, Jr..

SO ORDERED.

Signed: January 8, 2021

/s/_________

David S. Cayer

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Zahran v. Bank of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION
Jan 8, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-00427-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Zahran v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:GINA ZAHRAN, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 8, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-00427-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2021)