From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Youngblood v. City of Bakersfield

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 9, 2015
1:12-CV-01150-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)

Opinion

          MARDEROSIAN, CERCONE & COHEN Michael G. Marderosian Attorney for Defendants above-named.

          RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES Martha Rossiter Attorneys for Plaintiff


          STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

          JENNIFER L. THURSTON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         STIPULATION

         Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), and subject to the approval and order of the Court as provided below, the undersigned parties hereby stipulated to the dismissal of this action with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs, and request that the Court enter an Order dismissing this action with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

         ORDER

         The foregoing Stipulation of the parties is accepted and approved, and this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Youngblood v. City of Bakersfield

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 9, 2015
1:12-CV-01150-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Youngblood v. City of Bakersfield

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA P. YOUNGBLOOD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, CHRISTOPHER…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 9, 2015

Citations

1:12-CV-01150-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2015)