From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Waynesville R-VI School District

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Aug 7, 2013
524 F. App'x 313 (8th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1413

08-07-2013

David L. Young, Sr. Plaintiff - Appellant v. Waynesville R-VI School District; Judene Blackburn; Jon W. Oetinger; Thomas Elliott; Emma Clark; Marie Freeman; Darrel Vaughan Defendants - Appellees


Appeal from United States District Court

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield


[Unpublished]

Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

David L. Young, Sr. appeals from the district court's dismissal, with prejudice, of his employment-discrimination action as time-barred. He challenges the dismissal of his complaint and the denial of his motion for appointed counsel. Upon careful review, see Strand v. Diversified Collection Serv., Inc., 380 F.3d 316, 317 (8th Cir. 2004) (grant of motion to dismiss reviewed de novo); Stevens v. Redwing, 146 F.3d 538, 546 (8th Cir. 1998) (denial of request for appointed counsel reviewed for abuse of discretion), this court finds no basis for reversal and affirms the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.


Summaries of

Young v. Waynesville R-VI School District

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Aug 7, 2013
524 F. App'x 313 (8th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Young v. Waynesville R-VI School District

Case Details

Full title:David L. Young, Sr. Plaintiff - Appellant v. Waynesville R-VI School…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Aug 7, 2013

Citations

524 F. App'x 313 (8th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

McDaniel v. Kraft Foods Grp., Inc.

Failure to comply with this 90-day deadline warrants dismissal. See, e.g., Young v. Waynesville R-VI Sch.…