From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 1, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02456-BNB (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02456-BNB

11-01-2012

TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. USA, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Timothy Doyle Young, a federal prisoner currently housed in the State of Colorado, originally filed a Civil Complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. That court determined that venue in the instant action properly lies in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado and entered an order that transferred the action to this Court.

In an order entered on September 26, 2012, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland instructed Mr. Young to cure certain deficiencies if he wished to pursue his claims. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Boland ordered Mr. Young to file his claims on a Court-approved form that is used in filing prisoner complaints. Magistrate Judge Boland also directed Mr. Young either to pay the filing fee in full or to file a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 along with a certified copy of his trust fund statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the initiation of this action.

Although Mr. Young filed an Amended Complaint and a certified account statement, he failed to submit his claims on a proper Court-approved form and to provide a 28 U.S.C. § Motion and Affidavit. Mr. Young, therefore, has failed to cure all the deficiencies within the time allowed.

The Court also certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order is not taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Mr. Young files a notice of appeal he must also pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to cure deficiencies. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 1st day of November, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Young v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 1, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02456-BNB (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Young v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. USA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 1, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02456-BNB (D. Colo. Nov. 1, 2012)

Citing Cases

Young v. United States

No. 13-cv-00703-LTB (D. Colo. Apr. 25, 2013) (habeas; transferred from N.D. Cal.; construed as complaint and…