From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Mar 10, 1998
963 S.W.2d 473 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72382

Opinion Filed: March 10, 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Louis City; Michael P. David, Judge.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon Jill LaHue, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.



ORDER


Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He concedes his motion was filed out of time. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); State v. Blankenship, 830 S.W.2d 1, 16 (Mo. banc 1992). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Young v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE
Mar 10, 1998
963 S.W.2d 473 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Young v. State

Case Details

Full title:BILLY YOUNG, APPELLANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE

Date published: Mar 10, 1998

Citations

963 S.W.2d 473 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)