From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 16, 1929
121 So. 468 (Fla. 1929)

Summary

In Young v. State, 97 Fla. 214, 121 So. 469, which was a habeas corpus proceeding, it was contended that because the information under which Young was tried was signed, sworn to and filed by the Assistant County Solicitor of Hillsborough County, the petitioner should be discharged from custody on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Segars v. State, 94 Fla. 1128, 115 So. 537.

Summary of this case from Graives v. Stone

Opinion

Opinion filed February 16, 1929. Petition for rehearing denied March 28, 1929.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; W. T. Harrison, Judge.

Whitaker Brothers, for Plaintiff in Error;

Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, for the State.


Affirmed.


Summaries of

Young v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 16, 1929
121 So. 468 (Fla. 1929)

In Young v. State, 97 Fla. 214, 121 So. 469, which was a habeas corpus proceeding, it was contended that because the information under which Young was tried was signed, sworn to and filed by the Assistant County Solicitor of Hillsborough County, the petitioner should be discharged from custody on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Segars v. State, 94 Fla. 1128, 115 So. 537.

Summary of this case from Graives v. Stone
Case details for

Young v. State

Case Details

Full title:BILL YOUNG, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant in Error

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Feb 16, 1929

Citations

121 So. 468 (Fla. 1929)
121 So. 468

Citing Cases

Carbajal v. State

It would make no sense to conclude that an unauthorized signature on an information strips the circuit court…

State ex Rel. v. Circuit Court, 11th Judicial Circuit

The question of the sufficiency of the information not having been raised by motion to quash before going to…