From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Milyard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00723-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00723-PAB-MEH

04-24-2012

HARLEY QUINT YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN MILYARD, MARY COX-BERGMAN, BERNADETTE SCOTT, ANN PHELPS, and PATRICIA MANNING, Defendants.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Dismissal of Complaint Without Prejudice [Docket No. 52]. The Court has reviewed the pleading and is fully advised in the premises. It is

ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion for Dismissal of Complaint Without Prejudice [Docket No. 52] is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this matter, and all claims asserted therein, is dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

BY THE COURT:

____________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Young v. Milyard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00723-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Young v. Milyard

Case Details

Full title:HARLEY QUINT YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN MILYARD, MARY COX-BERGMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 24, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00723-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 24, 2012)