From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Miller

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 23, 2015
EDCV 14-1601-PSG (RNB) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)

Opinion

         Decided: March 19, 2015.

          Davi Le'Chaz Young, Petitioner, Pro se, Imperial, CA.

          For Amy Miller, Respondent: Daniel Brian Rogers, LEAD ATTORNEY, Kevin R Vienna, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Diego, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Young v. Miller

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 23, 2015
EDCV 14-1601-PSG (RNB) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Young v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:DAVI LE'CHAZ YOUNG, Petitioner, v. AMY MILLER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 23, 2015

Citations

EDCV 14-1601-PSG (RNB) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)