From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Hedgpeth

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 4, 2009
EDCV 08-00331 DOC (SS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2009)

Opinion


RICHARD COMPTON YOUNG, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Respondent. No. EDCV 08-00331 DOC (SS) United States District Court, C.D. California. August 4, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         1. The Petition is DENIED and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         2. The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein by United States mail on Petitioner and on counsel for Respondent.


Summaries of

Young v. Hedgpeth

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 4, 2009
EDCV 08-00331 DOC (SS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Young v. Hedgpeth

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD COMPTON YOUNG, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 4, 2009

Citations

EDCV 08-00331 DOC (SS) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2009)