Opinion
23-CV-3227 (PJS/JFD)
02-05-2024
HOWARD YOUNG, Petitioner, v. WARDEN B. EISCHEN, Respondent.
Petitioner Howard Young, pro se. Kristen Elise Rau and Ana H. Voss, United States Attorney's Office, for respondent B. Eischen
Petitioner Howard Young, pro se.
Kristen Elise Rau and Ana H. Voss, United States Attorney's Office, for respondent B. Eischen
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty. [ECF No. 9.] No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 9] is ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus of petitioner Howard Young [ECF No. 1] is DENIED.
3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.