From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Young v. Augustine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Jan 29, 2013
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00396-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 29, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00396-MP-EMT

01-29-2013

LAPHONSE AKILIO TREMANE YOUNG, Petitioner, v. PAIGE A AUGUSTINE, Respondent.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated December 12, 2012. (Doc. 18). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed.

Upon consideration, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, Doc. 1, is denied.

________________________

Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Young v. Augustine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Jan 29, 2013
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00396-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Young v. Augustine

Case Details

Full title:LAPHONSE AKILIO TREMANE YOUNG, Petitioner, v. PAIGE A AUGUSTINE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Jan 29, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00396-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 29, 2013)

Citing Cases

United States v. Smith

A challenge to BOP administrative programs must be filed in a habeas petition. U.S. v. Diggs, 2009 WL 2432746…